This term, as we anticipated, the Court rendered its decision in the Jack Daniel’s trademark infringement ... by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 1989. That court developed ...
In a case that was remanded back by the Supreme Court, a U.S. district court found the toy was a parody that did not infringe on Jack Daniel's trademark, but still tarnished the whiskey brand, noting ...
characterizing the dog toys as expressive work entitled to First Amendment protection. This vacated the decision of the lower court. In an appeal to the Supreme Court, the Jack Daniel’s argues ...