The simplest way to increase your subscriber count comes from asking viewers to subscribe. Data from YouTube shows that ...

Year 2015-16 and 2016-17 with the issues involved relating to levy of penalty under section 272A(2)(g) and section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short). All the appeals arise from ...

Challenging this decision, the assessee argued that while the maximum marginal rate (MMR) applies, the surcharge should only be levied as per the Finance Act, which explicitly states that surcharge is ...

Conclusion: Charging tolls on bad roads was unfair and ordered an 80% reduction in toll fees at 2 key toll plazas as tolls were meant to provide good-quality roads, and if the roads were damaged, ...

During the hearing, the counsel representing DGST assured the court that the refund application would be processed expeditiously, preferably within three weeks, subject to verification of facts. The ...

2. Without prejudice, even if such surcharge was applicable, the same can be levied only where the income of the assessee exceeds Rs. 50,00,000. In the present case since the assessee’s income was ...

The appellant is an Irrevocable Private Discretionary Trust formed under the Indian Trust Act, 1882. The tax liability of the Appellant is computed at the maximum marginal rate in accordance with the ...

Truth Fashion, a proprietorship owned by Ms. Sadia, filed a writ petition in the Delhi High Court seeking enforcement of an earlier order directing the release of a GST refund of ₹18.33 lakh. The ...

Madras High Court remanded the matter as notice in DRC-01A was merely uploaded in GST portal and hence petitioner was unaware about initiated proceedings. Further, petitioner directed to deposit 25% ...

The recent judgment of the Delhi High Court in Truth Fashion vs. Commissioner of DGST Delhi & Ors. (W.P. (C) 486/2025) is an important GST litigation discussion, particularly regarding delayed refunds ...

2. Percentage-Based Room Rent Limit: Many health insurance plans set the room rent cap as a percentage of the sum insured.

Madras High Court held that order passed without considering documentary evidences furnished by the petitioner suffers from non-application of mind to material on record. Hence, order set aside with ...