At the other extreme, if content is entirely generated by A.I., it cannot be protected by copyright,” a new report from the office reads ( via Artnet). “Between these boundaries, various forms and combinations of human contributions can be involved in producing A.

The Copyright Office said that technology use in creating creative works was not new and that AI was simply the latest technology for this.

The new guidelines say that AI prompts currently don’t offer enough control to “make users of an AI system the authors of the output.” (AI systems themselves can’t hold co

Artwork generated by artificial intelligence must have a human contributor to earn copyright protection in the United States, the U.S. Copyright Office has determined.

The generative AI boom has raised complex, multibillion-dollar legal questions that courts across the country are in the early stages of trying to address. A new report from the U.S. Copyright Office might help with at least one of them.

Part of a far-reaching report on AI and copyright, the U.S. Copyright Office has interpreted that unedited outputs of generative AI tools don't qualify for federal copyright shelter. The decision comes as part of a years-long AI initiative that set out to answer several outstanding legal questions as the AI boom ramped up,

Learn more about the ruling from the US Copyright Office that says art completely created by AI from text does not qualify for protection.